<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jenny’s Web World &#187; Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jennyconnors.com/category/logic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jennyconnors.com</link>
	<description>music~computers~coffee~and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ARGUMENTUM AD IGNORANTIAM</title>
		<link>http://www.jennyconnors.com/culture/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam</link>
		<comments>http://www.jennyconnors.com/culture/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennyconnors.com/random/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read this on another blog, and have to put it here so I don&#8217;t forget it. I refer to this concept quite frequently, but didn&#8217;t realize that it was put together so succinctly already.
ARGUMENTUM AD IGNORANTIAM
An argument that a proposition is true because it has not been shown to be false, or vice versa. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read this on another blog, and have to put it here so I don&#8217;t forget it. I refer to this concept quite frequently, but didn&#8217;t realize that it was put together so succinctly already.</p>
<p>ARGUMENTUM AD IGNORANTIAM</p>
<p>An argument that a proposition is true because it has not been shown to be false, or vice versa. Ad ignorantium arguments are also known as &#8220;appeals to ignorance.&#8221; This fallacy has two forms:</p>
<p>1. P is true, because it has not been proven false.<br />
2. P is false, because it has not been proven true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jennyconnors.com/culture/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>going postal</title>
		<link>http://www.jennyconnors.com/life/going-postal</link>
		<comments>http://www.jennyconnors.com/life/going-postal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennyconnors.com/uncategorized/going-postal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cost of a first class stamp is going up, when, Monday? So I made my  usual trip to the post office (not the one in Gloucester; another one which  shall remain anonymous) to exchange the two unopened rolls of 39¢ stamps I  have, and pick up another 60 2¢ stamps for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost of a first class stamp is going up, when, Monday? So I made my  usual trip to the post office (not the one in Gloucester; another one which  shall remain anonymous) to exchange the two unopened rolls of 39¢ stamps I  have, and pick up another 60 2¢ stamps for the open roll of stamps I  have.</p>
<p>Now let me digress for a moment to state that we rarely use stamps. I  have so many because I have a rule (we OCDers have lots of rules) that once I  open the last of something, I must get more immediately so I don&#8217;t run out.  Well, if you order stamps online, shipping costs the same regardless of whether  you order one or two rolls of stamps, so to save the 50¢ and the time spent  ordering, I usually order two rolls.</p>
<p>Anyway, so I&#8217;m at the aforementioned post office and ask to  exchange/return my old stamps. Despite having done this before at this exact  post office, I was told that they cannot take back stamps, and if I&#8217;ve ever  looked at my receipts, I&#8217;d have noticed that &#8220;all [stamp] sales are final.&#8221; So  being the constant questioning person I am, I asked WHY won&#8217;t take stamps back.   The response (in the words of Dave Barry, I am not making this  up)?</p>
<p>&#8220;Because all sales are final.&#8221; WOW! I&#8217;m  glad I got that cleared up!</p>
<p>I purchased 260 two-cent stamps and left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jennyconnors.com/life/going-postal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
